Thinking outside of the shelter

by Kristin on July 6, 2009

in Culture, ideas & paradigms

Photo by Karoly Lorentey

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results.”

Whether Benjamin Franklin said it or Albert Einstein, I’ve always liked this quote. It regularly inspires and pushes me to approach an idea or problem in my own life differently.

When it comes to broader societal problems, the well-known quote also leads me to this conclusion: We live in a country that functions within primarily insane power structures.

For the most part, people are OK with that because they feel safer when their lives are embedded in this pattern. They’d rather approach problems the same way over and over again and feel like at least someone’s attempting to help, rather than trying something completely different—something that might actually help. When you try a different approach, after all, anything could happen. You’re unleashing the unknown.

While all those people, if asked, would say they’re perfectly sane, this endless pattern makes ME crazy.

Homelessness is changing—shouldn’t our perspective & solutions change, too?

Take, for instance, the problem of homelessness. I won’t even try to address the many reasons people end up being homeless. What I want to talk about here is this very basic problem: An increasing number of men, women and children have no place to sleep come nightfall. Even in nice, small college towns like mine.

My friend, Jesse, has a heart for all those people. He believes in new approaches to problems, too. Jesse recently became aware of the growing number of tent communities popping up around the country—particularly Dignity Village in Portland, Oregon—and decided that sleeping in a tent, here in Champaign, was a good way to go. Before he knew it, others were interested in joining him, and a community called Safe Haven organically formed. (You can read more about it in a series at the online magazine Smile Politely, here and here.)

What I really like about this approach is that it’s different. It’s not just about throwing more money at the problem, or figuring out how to cram more people into shelters. It’s an affordable, simple, sustainable alternative to park benches and railroad viaducts. Safe Haven and other tent communities incorporate rules and self-governing, they offer a true sense of community, and they treat the homeless people with respect.

But there’s been a lot of resistance to the tent community—from the police, the city council, some neighbors and even the local newspaper, who for some reason decided to take a clearly negative stance. From all of the information I’ve gathered, both first-hand and via various articles I’ve read, the complaints are rooted in misinformation and misunderstanding.

Getting passionate about the solutions, not just the problems

I want to be clear: I’m not an expert in the variety of issues surrounding homelessness. I’ve never been a cop, a city council person, or a neighbor to a tent community.

I will say this, though: I’m tired of people who do nothing to address problems suddenly becoming vocal when they want to voice complaints.

I’m tired of people who don’t do their research, and really don’t know what they’re talking about, spouting off their opinions in letters to the editor and online forums (like the people who say “There are lots of shelters, if they don’t choose to stay in them that’s their own problem.”).

I’m tired of people wanting to sweep societal problems under the rug. The pervading “what-we-can’t-see-doesn’t-exist” attitude is both naive and dangerous. Homeless people camp out in our cities every night whether we see them or not—without a sense of community or self-governing or safety. It’s when they do something organized and visible that people suddenly get all worked up.

I’m tired of people only caring about themselves—whether it’s their tax dollars or how the appearance of their community reflects on them—and not having enough compassion to sit down and problem-solve together. It’s one thing to not be a fan of a proposed solution. It’s another thing to express your distaste without offering any potentially better solutions.

I realize not everyone is going to love the same approach. And everyone isn’t going to devote loads of personal time and money to solving broad societal problems like homelessness.

But unless people are willing to truly examine the big picture—to talk to people who are homeless and those who work every day to help them, and to see first-hand how quickly their viable options are exhausted—perhaps they should just sit quietly inside their safe homes, with their full refrigerators and big TVs, and keep their mouths shut.

Similar Posts:

Share:

  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • Trina

    “Not in my back yard’ is a common cry here too. I certainly agree about the ridiculous nature of spouting off a negative opinion without knowing anything ‘real’ about the issue at hand. While we all have a right to our own opinions, we owe it to ourselves to make those opinions – informed.

  • Heather

    Amen, my friend!

  • http://thealchemistblog.wordpress.com Genevieve Charet

    Thanks so much for letting us know about this issue–I had never heard of the tent communities before now. It angers me too when people who are clearly so interested in complaining are clearly so uninterested in coming up with a better way.

    I sympathize with some of the residents’ complaints–if things were being stolen from my property, or I was being kept up every night by loud, illegal activities, I’d be pissed, too. I’d like to think, though, that I’d try to figure out who was really at fault before I’d sling mud. Sounds to me like these people hate the lawless and disruptive activities that homelessness CAN breed just as much as everyone else does.

    I’d be interested to know how Jesse came to his decision to be willfully homeless…the gazette glosses over that. I think those stories can be the most inspiring and uniting ones.

    Thanks again.

  • http://twitter.com/SusanPotter Susan Potter

    With respect to local news coverage: what did you really expect from certain local news publications anyway? :) The local publication in question just feels so yesteryear and irrelevant that I wouldn’t worry about its coverage because it is only “informing” a handful of people that would be vocal about the issues regardless of what they read in the paper or not.

    Apparently the @news_gazette Twitter account was only created in October last year. Where were they? I had been writing software to connect to Twitter since March 2007 and I felt late to the game. There really isn’t any excuse for media companies of any kind to be that late to the game though.

  • http://www.orangeshirtguy.com Dave Thurston

    Just a Thought: It (the tent community) is either going to stay there . . . or not. Right?

    To not stay there, everyone just has to get mad at each other, then (a) one temper will flare and cause the police to be called or (b) someone will get hurt and cause the councilmen to step up, to be noble, and to save everyone else in the tent community from their own “ignorance of the danger they’re in” (i.e., shuffle the tents to a gym for a while, then disband it when the press dies down).

    To stay, doesn’t the tent community have to (a) know (not necessarily show and push it in someone’s face) that they have a legal right to be camping on the property, (b) address the fear (and possibly naive-fear) of the community of naysayers, and (c) become part of the larger community (a tribe (neighborhood) within a larger tribe (city/town))?

    There is a big, big bunch of stories there – I bet that people would be interested to read about them every week . . . and I bet that would help Letters B and C just above.

    Know any Advanced Placement English High School Students – that’d be something – Learning about life from “kids”.

  • http://twitter.com/SusanPotter Susan Potter

    Sorry I have just had this on my chest to rant about for a while re:local “news” outlets.

    I agree with your bigger points in the post too. I wish the community had leaders that thought differently about all kinds of issues generally.

  • http://barefooton45th.com Lesley

    Thank you for this post. Sacramento’s tent city is now famous thanks to Lisa Ling/ Oprah- who covered the issue back in February during a one hour show on homelessness. Her attention caused our Mayor to finally pay attention, and open a new shelter for the homeless. The tent city was promptly shut down weeks after the show. Just last week, the “new” shelter was closed to lack of funding. All those people? Back on the streets, forming new tent cities which will likely get shut down again.

    Same vicious cycle. You’d think more people around here would be supporting a different solution. So far, governed/established tent cities are only talk. I hope to see more action.

  • http://www.halfwaytonormal.com/ Kristin T.

    Trina, yes, you said more clearly what I was trying to say: We do all have a right to our opinions. And I’m thankful for that—that’s what makes the debate interesting. Now if we can all work harder to make the debate informed and constructive!

    Heather, thanks for the Amen, and for the great series of articles in Smile Politely. You’re doing a lot to share important information about the issue.

    Genevieve, I love that you’re so willing to dig into the information like this, and even read all the links! One word in particular stuck out in your comment. It’s in this sentence: “I sympathize with some of the residents’ complaints.” The word is “sympathize.” It’s connected to “compassion,” which I think is the key element missing in so many debates like this. As you suggest, it’s not just the homeless who need to be heard and shown compassion. Everyone affected by these less-than-ideal situations need to know others hear and sympathize with them. Regarding Jesse, perhaps I will see how he feels about me interviewing him and writing a post about his choices.

    Susan, yeah, I know. I’ve avoided traditional forms of local news, for the most part, since moving here eight years ago. By removing myself from it, sometimes I become delusional about the concept of a small news organization being able to simply share information. But alas, there’s always an agenda. I realize there’s a place for news with a clear slant (I listen to NPR, after all!). I just don’t think a small city’s paper should lean so blatantly in one direction.

    Dave, that’s a good run-down of where things stand. I’m sure there are more legal and political issues than I can even begin to comprehend, but that’s the gist of it. And your point about the many interesting stories waiting to be told, and how they would help everyone understand the bigger picture, is a really good one. I have two main concerns here: One is that people take the issue of homelessness seriously and compassionately, and the other is that the story is told from more perspectives, in more depth—by traditional media and alternative. Are you suggesting that some high school or college students interview and write the stories? That’s a great idea. I’m friends with one of the English teachers at the University High School here. They do a lot in the community—I’ll have to see what she thinks.

  • http://www.halfwaytonormal.com/ Kristin T.

    Lesley, a vicious cycle, indeed. It’s good to hear about experiences in other cities, from dealing with local government to media frustrations and successes, and of course the day-to-day plight of the homeless. I’ll definitely have to look for that Oprah segment. Thanks for letting us know what’s happening in Sacramento.

  • http://www.orangeshirtguy.com Dave Thurston

    The stories that Ms. Dillon is writing are a great step forward. Your posts are in the same camp. They are making a difference.

    Your interpretation of my idea re: HS students hits the nail well. The current tent city’s place-in-the-universe might be to house some homeless in Champaign (good and laudable), but its master-purpose might just be to create a bit of a ground swell of compassion/enlightenment in a local HS class . . . which might in a bit of time, help bring the sides to better understand each other.

    At a minimum, the tent city will have served a purpose. And that sounds like a victory that Ms. Dillon, you, and the current tent dwellers might be able to be proud of — even if the current battle is not won.

  • http://www.ihatemymessageboard.com Tracy

    I really hate the way that it seems one of our most cherished national myths is that we’re a nation of self-made men and women. It makes it far too easy to ignore social problems, because after all it’s the individual’s fault and there is nothing you can do about another individual’s failings. Pah! Bullhonkey.

  • http://compostermom.blogspot.com Daisy

    Our school district has a program for kids who become homeless. They get transported to their original school, free breakfast and lunch, tutoring, and more. The most interesting part of this that many of the families are not in tents or in shelters: they’re doubled up with relatives. If the family is doubled up for financial reasons (got evicted, moved in with friends/ sister/ cousin/ etc.) they still qualify. I fear the loss of this program would pull the rug out from so many. The best way to support the program now is to continue referring kids; that way, the need shows.

  • http://radicalloveproject.com Angela Harms

    Shutting down tent cities is really amazing to me. I really have trouble figuring out how somebody could think that’s a good idea, or sleep at night after they do it.

    That said, the folks I work with aren’t in a tent city. Mostly, they’re drunk. (Not always.) Far from being a “self-governing” community, they still matter. They get tickets from the cops for drinking beer in the park. Then, they get excluded from the park, so they have to sit on the sidewalk instead. Then they go to jail for going back into the park after being excluded.

    It’s a very weird world we live in, I think. I get tired of the lack of compassion, too. But I can’t help but think that our love does make a difference. So, I just keep trying to do that.

  • http://mothershaffer.wordpress.com mother shaffer

    My philosophy (which I expect everyone to adopt immediately) is not to complain unless you have a well-thought out alternative solution to the problem. Because the complaining is the easiest thing to do. The solution is what takes real thought and consideration.

  • http://www.halfwaytonormal.com/ Kristin T.

    Dave, I love the idea of “a ground swell of compassion/enlightenment” bringing greater understanding, especially through teens. I’ll keep you posted!

    Tracy, that “self-made” myth really does play into this whole issue. I hadn’t thought of that. It reminds me of how a person’s greatest weakness is often inextricably tied up in their greatest strength. I guess a society is made up of people, so I shouldn’t be surprised. :)

    Daisy, that sounds like a great program. Is it a district program, or does it have state or federal ties? Someone just recently told me a bit about the rights of homeless kids in relation to education. I’m interested to find out more.

    Angela, thanks for reminding me (all of us) that ALL people matter, whether they’re sober or drunk, or living in an orderly or chaotic fashion. It’s so easy for me to be eager to advocate for certain people behaving in certain ways, and to be at a loss when it comes to other people, who I’d just as soon sweep aside. You, and the love you share in very real ways every day, *does* make a difference—to the people who need friendship and to those of us in need of inspiration.

    Mother Shaffer, I’m all in with your philosophy! It’s certainly the approach in high-functioning families and workplaces, so more people should give it a try in respect to broader social issues. Maybe we should come up with a slogan and start a movement. :)

  • Jason

    Ironically, across town people are invited to spend next Saturday night camping in meadowbrook park. I guess camping is a fun, community building activity for people who have homes, but a nuisance if you have no where else to go.